![]() ![]() ![]() Rights regimes, which further raised the question of whether the Court wouldĬourt of Human Rights or whether it would take a different approach. Issues are hotly debated in international law and in the context of To international humanitarian law (‘IHL’). Right to life must be interpreted in the context of the conduct of hostilities Particular, during international armed conflict (‘IAC’) - theĮxtraterritorial application of the Convention The European Convention on Human Rights (‘ ECHR’) in Issues pertain to the applicability of human rights. With respect to a number of highly contested issues in legal practice and Georgia and Russia in 2008, it was expected Against the background of the brief armed conflict between Judgment in the interstate case Georgia v RussiaĪwaited by many. ![]() ![]() The European Court of Human Rights’ (‘Court’) Grand Chamber IV The ECHR and International Humanitarian LawīACK? GEORGIA V RUSSIA (II), EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS, APPL.| Feedback Melbourne Journal of International Law Tan, Floris Zwanenburg, Marten - "One Step Forward, Two Steps Back? Georgia v Russia (II), European Court of Human Rights, Appl No 38263/08" MelbJlIntLaw 5 (2021) 22(1) Melbourne Journal of International Law 136 ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |